Digital Marketing Commentary (Now With 15% More Snark!)

April 25, 2011

The SEO Rapper = Awesome

Filed under: Uncategorized — jilliantate @ 9:06 pm

The SEO Rapper is combining two of everyone’s favorite things: coherent rap and inbound marketing. Last week, he paid a visit to Hubspot in Boston and seriously upped their street cred.

I first learned of the SEO Rapper when I ran across his video on page rank in the wake of the JC Penney scandal. Remember that? It was when JCP was busted using inbound links from spam farms to rank #1 on any Google term that correlated to an item they sold. Prom dresses? Samsonite Luggage? Somewhere, a link farm was making that term look relevant for JC Penney. The SEO rapper does not condone such things, and his “Page Rank” video explains exactly what kind of hard work needs to be done in lieu of those content farms. Of course, Google pretty much handled the spam link farms with their Panda update. Now, the methods espoused by the SEO Rapper are the only way to achieve top rankings in organic search.

I think the SEO Rapper is actually fantastic. He has a lot of excellent points, and has cleverly woven them into rap. The videos are also almost parodies of rap videos, but contain too much information to be mere humor.

BTW, speaking of parodies, THIS is a parody:

YouTube, is there anything you can’t give us?

February 12, 2011

$2.7B Increase in Ad Spending This Year on Social Sites

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , — jilliantate @ 2:37 pm

As social networks grow in size, advertisers are also increasing ad spending on social sites. In 2011, 10.8% of all US online ad spending will go to social networks; and that number is expected to rise to 12.1% in 2012. IMS took a look recently at some of the factors helping to drive this increase in advertising across social networking sites and how this media channel can be adapted for direct response. Here are the top five reasons we see for the projected increase in social ad spend in 2011:
1) Increased social site user population. Facebook grew from 121M to 147M unique users in 2010. More users mean more impressions – and more potential for ad spending
2) Targeting ability. Social sites give advertisers the opportunity to isolate and target very precise niches. Marketers with profiling data can set up campaigns to only reach the most likely to convert consumers. For example, IMS recently ran a Facebook Ads campaign on behalf of Hair Club to promote their American Chopper show appearance. We targeted only men 35 to 55, who had listed any of a dozen chopper related interests in their profiles. With interest targeting and the event tie-in, the cost per fan was the lowest yet for an IMS client campaign.

3) New ad products, including in-app ads. Over 225M people play the top 5 games on Facebook, creating a huge audience for in-game ads. Sites are also developing more engaging ad types that give users the opportunity to take an action in the ad, such as “Like” or “Share”, without leaving the page they are on.

4) Local targeting and increased SMB spending. With the increase in location-based social networking (Foursquare, Facebook Places, Yelp Check-Ins), more small and medium business are using social networking sites on a geotargeted basis customized to their sales area.

5) More social networking sites following the “Facebook model”. LinkedIn has announced that they will begin running more social ads (above) which can be targeted to people based on their professional profile.
IMS is watching this space closely to establish where the best opportunities lie for our clients. As the audiences on these sites grow, we will continue to test new targeting and messaging to achieve and exceed goal costs-per.

February 4, 2011

Dear Groupon: FIX YOUR LOGIN BEFORE THE SUPERBOWL

Filed under: Uncategorized — jilliantate @ 10:51 am

Last night, while updating my transactions on Mint, I saw an ad for Groupon’s version of the LivingSocial/Amazon deal. Groupon, in their second nationwide brand partnership, are offering $20 worth of merchandise at Barnes and Noble for $10. The only problem is that, while LivingSocial managed to handle their 80% traffic jump and sell over a million Amazon vouchers, Groupon is experiencing a “fail whale” situation at the login screen:

groupon failwhale

Groupon's Login Screen, as of 10:47AM PST February 4th

This started at 10pm PST last night, and is STILL happening over 12 hours later. This is kind of a shock. And a disappointment. Groupon’s screen says that users can purchase the Groupon using their account emails, and it will be added to their accounts later. But I happen to have a $10 credit with Groupon from when my DealBucks were converted last week, and I would very much like to use that to purchase this deal. Furthermore, Groupon redemptions will be on hold everywhere until this login is resolved, because being unable to log in also means being unable to access existing Groupons.

So now I’m waiting to find out:

1) When will Groupon be back up so I can download my voucher for cupcakes for a team meeting today?
2) How will this affect sales of this deal, and skew comparisons against LivingSocial/Amazon?
3) Is Groupon REALLY ready to run a $3M ad this weekend? If we’re getting the fail whale effect on Friday, will they be able to reap the benefits from the ad on Sunday?

January 31, 2011

Expect More “Effective” Privacy Measures in 2011

Filed under: digital media buying, State of the Internet, Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — jilliantate @ 9:26 am

By the way, I mean “effective” with quotes, like in the “Blog” of Unnecessary Quotation Marks

FireFox and Google Chrome browsers made headlines this week when they announced new “plug ins” that would effectively screen users from being targeted by advertisers and marketers. The “Keep My Opt Outs” plugin for Chrome is an extension for users who aren’t “comfortable with personalization of the ads they see on the web”. Google calls it a “one-step, persistent opt-out of personalized advertising and related data tracking performed by companies adopting the industry privacy standards for online advertising.”

FireFox and Google Chrome browsers made headlines this week when they announced new “plug ins” that would effectively screen users from being targeted by advertisers and marketers. The “Keep My Opt Outs” plugin for Chrome is an extension for users who aren’t “comfortable with personalization of the ads they see on the web”. Google calls it a “one-step, persistent opt-out of personalized advertising and related data tracking performed by companies adopting the industry privacy standards for online advertising.”

This follows on the heels of the announcements made by the IAB and DMA to voluntarily self-regulate as part of the National Advertising Initiative (NAI). The NAI centers around an “Advertising Option Icon”, triangular icon indicating program participation, which is to be displayed in or near online advertisements or on Web pages where data is collected and used for behavioral advertising. By clicking on it consumers will be able to link to a clear disclosure statement regarding the data collection and use practices associated with the ad. Consumers will also be presented with an easy-to-use opt-out mechanism, so they may not be targeted by that advertiser in future.

However, while the NAI is an initiative adopted and paid for by marketers and advertisers on a voluntary basis, these new privacy plug-ins must be adopted and installed by consumers in order to be effective. At this time, only the Google privacy plug-in is available for Chrome, which is only used by 12.4% of the US online population. Firefox, which has 26.9% of the browsing population, does not have a definitive release date for their user-secured privacy technology. It’s unlikely that these kind of “opt outs” will be used by more than a very small percentage of the population, who is tech savvy enough to use one of these browsers, and install the plug ins.

Valleywag, Gawker Media’s tech blog, took an even more cynical approach to this show of privacy protection. A post written on January 24th observed that “Google itself is easily the biggest perpetrator of precisely the sort of tracking this software is designed to prevent. Its advertising wing, DoubleClick, has trackers on 70 of the top 100 websites, a ubiquity second only to Google Analytics. The DoubleClick tracker follows you around the web and targets ads at you based on your surfing habits. It also builds up a demographic profile of you and targets ads that way. Google trackers also target ads at you based on searches you’ve run on Google.com. Finally, the indiscreet configuration of Google’s search engine is essential in providing your search keywords to all ad trackers; Google stubbornly refuses to change this setup.”

The Gawker observation, while extreme, is likely more accurate, and therefore more relevant for marketers and advertisers. Google also seeks to bring back display advertising, an initiative for which the user of targeting and customized ads will be crucial, in order to show improved click through rates. Wide range adoption of privacy protection software could detract from display advertising success. Similarly, effective blocking of cookie and tracking data could prevent DSP’s and ad exchages such as Yahoo’s Right Media, or MDC’s Varick Media, from effectively targeting and bidding on impressions to consumers most likely to convert. Just as a low buy-in rate from advertisers has resulted in an absence of the NAI’s triangular icons “in the wild”, a similarly low install rate from consumers will likely keep these new privacy measures from impacting ad revenues in 2011.

IMS will continue to work with new anonymized targeting technology to find ways to effectively reach the ideal customers for our clients. We will also continue to balance targeting and effective personalization to ensure that it does not create the impression or perception of intrusion on consumers. Should new privacy measures arise that change our ability to reach a target market, we will advise on changes or alternate strategies.

Resource links:

http://searchengineland.com/browsers-to-offer-behavioral-targeting-blocking-62334

http://valleywag.gawker.com/5742225/dont-be-fooled-by-googles-fake-new-privacy

January 26, 2011

Facebook Sponsored Stories: You Are Now Endorsing Any Brand You Mention

Filed under: facebook, social media, Uncategorized — Tags: , , — jilliantate @ 9:21 pm

I wrote the below as a comment to David Berkowitz’ post on Mashable about Facebook’s Sponsored Stories.

David, did you see this article?
I was really surprised to see All Things D’s editorial take on this new program. I agree with your statement in your op-ed that your initial posts on Facebook “come from the heart”. In their initial posts, users, like you, are choosing to mention their association with a brand. The Sponsored Stories crosses that line from mentioning association to full-on endorsement. I may post that I’m at a Starbucks because I freely associate and identify with that brand’s image, but that doesn’t mean I want Starbucks to make that look like a recommendation to my friends. Also, I know most of my friends may miss my initial post in their Feeds, and blowing it up into a full on ad makes it very difficult to miss, and much less of the casual, organic mention I meant it to be.

As a user, I agree there should be an opt out. But as a marketer, I’m ready to get client ads up on there the second the option opens up to me in the self-service ads center. This is actually a fantastic fit for a brand who interacts well with people on their Facebook page, since engaging their customers in dialogue will give them lots of stories to sponsor. This could be part of really big Facebook strategies, and could help close the gap between paid and organic marketing on social media. It’s tough NOT to like it from a purely marketing standpoint.

Deal Sites Trending Towards National

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , , — jilliantate @ 9:17 pm

[Excerpted from the IMS Digital Updates newsletter, 01/26/10]

One of the biggest trends in 2010 was the new “deal of the day” site phenomenon. What began with the startup known as Groupon, rapidly grew into a full scale phenomenon. By the end of the year, dozen knock-off sites had materialized, and established local sites such as Yelp and Zagat, as well as discount sites such as Gilt City and RueLaLa, had rolled out their own Groupon competitors. Now Google has even announced it is rolling out a Groupon-model deal site. How will the entry of major online powers, such as Google, or the Amazon buyout of Living Social, affect the category moving forward, and how will it change hyper-local marketing?
Last week, LivingSocial made headlines when the site offered a $20 Amazon.com credit for $10. Because of the broad appeal of Amazon.com, by the end of the 24 hour sale period, LivingSocial had sold over 1.2 million vouchers. This was a significant increase over Groupon’s most historically popular deal with GAP from 2010. Since LivingSocial is owned by Amazon.com, this was a deal that benefited both brands even more than the usual voucher deal.
The rising success of these deals is beginning to raise questions about whether they are a valid hyperlocal advertising opportunity. Groupons routinely sell a thousand or more vouchers in a 24 hour period, and Groupon charges 50% of the Groupon sale price to the business running the offer, for a total 75% loss off the voucher face price. Small business owners are also reporting that the Groupon voucher holders are less interested in discovering a new local retailer, and more interested in taking advantage of a one-time deal. Since the local deal sites are only as strong as the brands they offer, national brands who can afford to take major initial losses may become more prominent on the most popular local deal sites. The true local advertisers may begin moving to smaller daily deal sites, where they will have less risk of loss

This raises three questions for 2011: will these “second tier” startups survive? And, if the major deal a day sites continue to take on more national brands and attract more short-term deal seeking customers, will these smaller sites gain more of the hyper-local deals from retailers looking to invest in new customers? And finally, what new deal-a-day opportunities will come up that could take both the national and the hyperlocal markets?

December 27, 2010

Shocking: Customer Service from AT&T!

Filed under: Uncategorized — jilliantate @ 11:02 am

Four years ago, my husband and I moved into our apartment. I like to call it “the oldest apartment in L.A.”: four townhouse style units in a rambling 1917 building. It has high ceilings, hardwood floors…and wiring issues.

When we moved in, the most apparent of these was that none of the phone jacks inside worked. So we called AT&T. They sent a repair tech out who informed us that the test box was working, so our jacks should be. Therefore, it was our landlord’s problem, and they needed to re-wire the apartment. If we wanted further testing, we could pay $50 to have a tech investigate further. So we told our landlord, and jury rigged our DSL through the test box line instead, running the phone cord in a window, down the hall, and to the wifi router. And four years later, we still had that temporary solution in place.

This weekend, the DSL slowed to unacceptable speeds. I was working on a client project and had to be able to download and upload photos and video. Not exactly possible at 8kbps. Assuming the rain and possible AT&T node failures were to blame, I called DSL customer service, and actually got a solid rep…who spoke English…and was in the USA!  From Indianapolis, he checked our DSL, informed us it might be a bad line, and listened as I told him how we had rigged the line four years before.  He then offered to send a rep to look at the line on a Sunday.

When the rep showed up at 5pm last night, he went straight to work checking all the house jacks. He carefully went through and checked wiring on multiple inside jacks, and informed us the wiring WAS messed up…but he thought he could fix it!  And he actually spent an hour with us that resulted in a dial tone on an inside jack!  He took the time and care to find out what was wrong and fix it, instead of passing the problem on to us and our landlords. Maybe he was a better tech…but maybe AT&T had changed their policy for the better to allow him to be a better rep.

So. What does this say about AT&T?  It tells me they should be taking more credit for my experience. Reps in the US to handle customer service?  Techs that come out on a Sunday to fix a line?  I will pay extra to be able to work with their people, because they were empowered enough by the company to get the job done and fix my DSL. They weren’t hampered by policies that kept them from doing their job, and were allowed to take every step necessary. Maybe this is a fluke. But, if it isn’t, AT&T, you should be telling more people about how you helped me.

July 20, 2010

New Skype Click to Call Ads

Filed under: Uncategorized — jilliantate @ 5:01 pm

Calls are more valuable than e-leads. They convert better, because an inbound call is always going to be more interested in buying than a user who submitted a form and is being called back hours later. Call center reps can close a deal better on an inbound call than they can on a form-fill lead that they’re calling back. Inbound calls, like PPC search leads, are the cream of the crop of DR marketing

That said, Skype is now selling a click to call product through Marchex. The article in AdAge on it today just forgot to mention one TINY LITTLE DETAIL. Users ONLY see the “Free Call” button if they have the Skype browser plugin installed. I’m a geek, I use Skype daily, and I don’t even have that plugin. So how many people are ever going to see that “Free Call” highlighted link? Skype/Marchex still haven’t told me.

This is a great idea, and if everyone who just had Skype installed on their computer (or smartphone!) would see this link, then it would be huge. But because it requires a browser extension to be installed, and it’s probably a very small market. Is this worth the time to set up & test? Depends on the size of the client. But if your Google click to call gets less than a dozen calls per month, you’re probably not going to get too many here.

May 26, 2010

Foursquare Hits 700,000 Check-Ins

Filed under: Uncategorized — jilliantate @ 3:41 am

700,000 people checked in on Foursquare last Friday. That’s 700,000 check-ins in one day. For a social media tool that no one seems to know how to use, that’s ridiculous. (Exception: The Governator is already on it.)

The question is, how does this actually affect the marketing landscape? Foursquare is still a blip on the radar. No one can tell me it will be as big as Facebook, or even as big as Twitter. Facebook is now powering the web, providing a back-end sign-in architecture that Google dreamed of a few years ago. And Twitter is still easier to use and understand than Foursquare, because you can sum it up in one sentence: “like blogging, but shorter.” How do you even start describing Foursquare to your friends? More importantly, who are these 700,000 check-ins? How many unique users is that? And does that represent the majority of the people who will ever sign up for Foursquare? Has Foursquare already achieved saturation in its market of young, urban types who go out and remember to check in on their smartphones? I mean, I have the app on both phones (home and work), and I always forget to check in when I go out. Will there be a drop-off rate in usage that exceeds the sign-up rate, and will that come soon?

I see the marketing future of Foursquare in three directions. First of all, there’s the small, local aspect: offering discounts for check-ins, or for the mayors of a location. Tasty-D-Lite is doing this in NYC, and Starbucks is offering $1 off Frappucinos for all store mayors through June. The second is to set up specific badges by working with Foursquare, but that’s only really feasible if you have national advertising branding dollars behind your plan. I’d love to set up a program where a client gave out custom badges when people checked in, but I have no idea how much that would even cost, and I haven’t been able to track down anyone at Foursquare to tell me. (My guess? “A lot.”) And the third would be to have paid “suggestions” available, an ad for a nearby business that pops up when you check in somewhere. That might diminish the customer experience somewhat, but would it drive enough foot traffic – especially if it included a discount or other offer – to offset the complaints?

I’m watching you, Foursquare. I’m checking in on you, when I remember to do so. And as soon as I figure out a way to put effective advertising on you, I will do it.

January 6, 2010

Hey Apple: Do You Actually Know What Quattro Does?

Filed under: Uncategorized — jilliantate @ 6:12 am

Apple bought Quattro Wireless today. If you were totally out of the blogosphere, you can catch the recap on All Things D.

Seriously, I really can’t figure out what Quattro’s got that Apple couldn’t just build, or what they have that Apple can use. The AdMob acquisition by Google made sense to me, because Google can now add the AdMob inventory and infrastructure onto the rest of the Google Network. I expect it will eventually function as an extension of the Google Network, only with mobile ads instead of full size display banners. Quattro has an extensive network, but how is Apple going to leverage that? I can understand that perhaps Apple wants some of the mobile site development technology that Quattro sells, but why would Apple want mobile advertising inventory? To compete with Google?

Kara Swisher says:

    “Both innovative start-ups are aimed squarely at the fast-growing market to advertise on smartphones, such as Apple’s iPhone and Google’s Android devices.”

Yes, but how does that tie in with the greater business plans of both companies? How is Apple going to leverage the (rather excellent, actually) advertising, analytics, tracking, hosting, and general campaign management of Quattro’s mobile advertising core competency? I’m stymied, folks. Anyone have any ideas?

Older Posts »

Theme: Silver is the New Black. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.